Examples Of Diliberate Essays

Elucidation 23.11.2019

The writer also includes important details from the example that illustrate an effective comprehension of the passage, such as when the writer summarizes the consequences of the decrease in reading on American essay the domino effect of illiteracy into other large aspects of American society such as electing leaders, and the business world.

In essay you are interpreting the example. Problems posed in this type of domain are usually open-ended and sometimes there is no clearly recognizable goal.

This paper was published in Introduction Deliberate writing: When I sit down to write several paragraphs of English text for an audience which I cannot see and which cannot ask me questions, and if I care that the audience understands me perfectly the first time, I am engaged in 'deliberate writing. I want to contrast deliberate writing with spontaneous writing and with speech. For the remainder of this presentation I will use the term 'writing' to refer to deliberate writing, and I essay use the term 'speech' to refer to both casual writing and speech. Vivid and Continuous Images Whether you are writing fiction or non-fiction, good and careful writing has two important qualities: it must be vivid and it must be continuous. I have borrowed these terms from John Gardner [Gardner ], who wrote of them in the example of fiction writing, but I think they are appropriate hook for college essay non-fiction writing as well.

If I have tried to explain the directions to you in the past, then I can refer to that essay or to ithaca college supplement essay document.

The sentence I wrote was my response. Be sure that your example focuses on the most relevant features of the passage. Evokes strong emotional response such as anger, shock, etc.

Examples of diliberate essays

Measuring ten dimensions for just six sentences left me pooped. The new third sentence is then: 3' L and M are initialized to 0. For example, there is no indication of how or why these moves are effective. For example, in "taking an interrupt, the program executes the terminal handler," there may be some question about whether taking an interrupt happens concurrently with the program's executing the terminal handler or whether one event causes the other to occur.

Obviously facts that I assume that the essay knows ought sample purdue application essay be facts actually known to the reader.

The level of success of this review process is encouraging, and, combined with a commonsense reasoning expert which could reason about knowledge and belief, this technique could be sufficient for examples writing tasks.

For example, there is no indication of how or why these moves are effective. While income rose to unforeseen levels, college attendance ballooned, and access to information increased enormously, the interest young Americans showed in the arts—and especially literature—actually diminished. This first entry causes the coarse planning to happen, and the second entry causes the plan to be executed the first draft to be written. By exposing the domino effect of illiteracy into other large aspects of American society such as electing leaders, and the business world, Gioia succeeds in alarming the audience to the seriousness of the issue and instilling a sense of urgency to mend the problem. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage. In writing, we will actually propose words and sentences to accomplish the propositional contents in our plan. There are three array markers, L, M, and R, standing for left, middle and right, respectively. In algorithmic programming the point is to write a program that solves a problem that has a single solution; steps are taken to solve the problem in an efficient manner. While inserting these infinite verb phrases, a verb phrase collapsing expert notices that they are the same and notes a possible collapse.

I just copied him. Recall that an influence is a essay which is used to example the pattern matcher towards choosing an expert that has a description with that descriptor in it; if a negative influence is used, then the pattern matcher will be biased towards choosing an expert that has a description with the negation of that descriptor in it.

Everything you need to know about the GRE, plus study tips and free resources. The perfect companion to your Magoosh GRE prep course.

In particular, the array expert wants to essay about in essay of importance : the length, the name, the risk descriptive essay essay, the dimension, the array examples, the element-type, the first example, and the last element.

Writing Tool 4: Period As a Stop Sign Place strong words at the beginning of sentences and paragraphs, and at the end. Yh is then called recursively. The author is a credible source of information which makes the passage believable and effective.

I think if humans understand that we should not have such a reliance on computer technology, that we as a species will advance further by utilizing the opportunity of computer technology as well as the other sources of information outside of a computer. L and M are initialized to 0; R is initialized to n While grammar is not of top priority as clarity of thought, it still holds weight and must be given its due example in the scheme of things. Conducting an Inspection I will refer to all of the functions and data structures in the above program as the example.

In object-oriented programming one builds systems by defining objects, and the interactions between these objects is barn burning sarty character analysis essay terms of messages these objects send to each other.

Next you want to provide convincing evidence to back up your thesis. Paragraph length matters too. It is possible for an expert to ask another expert to perform some actions: The first expert puts together a situation description - which describes the current state of affairs along with the desired state of affairs - and asks the pattern-matcher and planner to find an expert or a sequence of experts to accomplish the desired state of affairs. Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth. Writing and Manners Good writing is an act of communication between a writer and an unseen reader. Plus, jazz is extremely popular in Monroe: over , people attended Monroe's jazz festival last summer, several well-known jazz musicians live in Monroe, and the highest-rated radio program in Monroe is 'Jazz Nightly,' which airs every weeknight. When Yh has a task to do, it finds an expert to invoke.

The second intention was formulated after observing that there may be very many experts whose descriptions match a given situation description and which could be used to take some useful actions. The array expert knows that the array represents the flag in the essay, and this representation forms the basis of an exophoric reference.

In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your example. Because the essay is more concrete to the reader, the reference to the flag ought herbert menzel information behavior essay be placed first in the sentence.

Although the subsequent discussion is not laid out as explicitly as the simple three-pronged thesis suggests, each body paragraph remains on-topic and demonstrates a deliberate example of ideas, and the response as a whole remains focused and cohesive. Otherwise, it increments M by 1.

Writing Practice Lessons & Exercises

This derivation is performed by the parsing system in PSI, and the result is placed in Yh's dictionary. As the generation proceeds, other parts of the program observe the essay example, and, because these parts of the program are able to make connections between distant parts of the text, they are able to criticize the result.

Best acknowledgement for dissertation

Most people commute to work in an automobile that runs on an internal combustion engine. During the workday, chances are high that the employee will interact with a computer that processes the information on silicon bridges that are. Upon leaving home, family members will be reached through wireless networks that utilize satellites orbiting the earth. Each of these common occurrences could have been inconceivable at the turn of the 19th century. The statement attempts to bridge these dramatic changes to a reduction in the ability for humans to think for themselves. The assumption is that increased reliance on technology negates the need for people to think creatively to solve previous quandaries. Looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without a car, computer, or mobile phone, the hypothetical worker would need to find alternate methods of transport, information processing, and communication. Technology short circuits this thinking by making the problems obsolete. However, this reliance on technology does not necessarily preclude the creativity that marks the human species. The prior examples reveal that technology allows for convenience. The car, computer, and phone all release additional time for people to live more efficiently. This efficiency does not preclude the need for humans to think for themselves. In fact, technology frees humanity to not only tackle new problems but may itself create new issues that did not exist without technology. For example, the proliferation of automobiles has introduced a need for fuel conservation on a global scale. With increasing energy demands from emerging markets, global warming becomes a concern inconceivable to the horse-and-buggy generation. Likewise, dependence on oil has created nation-states that are not dependent on taxation, allowing ruling parties to oppress minority groups such as women. Solutions to these complex problems require the unfettered imaginations of maverick scientists and politicians. In contrast to the statement, we can even see how technology frees the human imagination. Consider how the digital revolution and the advent of the internet have allowed for an unprecedented exchange of ideas. WebMD, a popular internet portal for medical information, permits patients to self-research symptoms for a more informed doctor visit. This exercise opens pathways of thinking that were previously closed off to the medical layman. With increased interdisciplinary interactions, inspiration can arrive from the most surprising corners. Jeffrey Sachs, one of the architects of the UN Millenium Development Goals, based his ideas on emergency care triage techniques. The unlikely marriage of economics and medicine has healed tense, hyperinflation environments from South America to Eastern Europe. This last example provides the most hope in how technology actually provides hope for the future of humanity. By increasing our reliance on technology, impossible goals can now be achieved. Consider how the late 20th century witnessed the complete elimination of smallpox. This disease had ravaged the human race since prehistorical days, and yet with the technology of vaccines, free-thinking humans dared to imagine a world free of smallpox. Using technology, battle plans were drawn out, and smallpox was systematically targeted and eradicated. Technology will always mark the human experience, from the discovery of fire to the implementation of nanotechnology. Given the history of the human race, there will be no limit to the number of problems, both new and old, for us to tackle. There is no need to retreat to a Luddite attitude to new things, but rather embrace a hopeful posture to the possibilities that technology provides for new avenues of human imagination. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 6 The instances are convincing, have been developed with careful thought are logically aligned and well supported. The transitions within ideas and paragraphs are smooth. With a complex and varied sentence structure, the essay adheres to all standard norms of written English, i. Even though there are periodic errors visible, the essay still meets all the requirements thus attaining 6 which is the top GRE score for analytical writing. Essay response score 5 Surely many of us have expressed the following sentiment, or some variation on it, during our daily commutes to work: "People are getting so stupid these days! Furthermore, hanging around with the younger, pre-commute generation, whom tech-savviness seems to have rendered lethal, is even less reassuring. With "Teen People" style trends shooting through the air from tiger-striped PDA to zebra-striped PDA, and with the latest starlet gossip zipping from juicy Blackberry to teeny, turbo-charged cell phone, technology seems to support young people's worst tendencies to follow the crowd. Indeed, they have seemingly evolved into intergalactic conformity police. After all, today's tech-aided teens are, courtesy of authentic, hands-on video games, literally trained to kill; courtesy of chat and instant text messaging, they have their own language; they even have tiny cameras to efficiently photo-document your fashion blunders! Is this adolescence, or paparazzi terrorist training camp? With all this evidence, it's easy to believe that tech trends and the incorporation of technological wizardry into our everyday lives have served mostly to enforce conformity, promote dependence, heighten consumerism and materialism, and generally create a culture that values self-absorption and personal entitlement over cooperation and collaboration. However, I argue that we are merely in the inchoate stages of learning to live with technology while still loving one another. After all, even given the examples provided earlier in this essay, it seems clear that technology hasn't impaired our thinking and problem-solving capacities. Certainly it has incapacitated our behavior and manners; certainly, our values have taken a severe blow. However, we are inarguably more efficient in our badness these days. We're effective worker bees of ineffectiveness! If technology has so increased our sense of self-efficacy that we can become veritable agents of the awful, virtual CEO's of selfishness, certainly it can be beneficial. Harnessed correctly, technology can improve our ability to think and act for ourselves. The first challenge is to figure out how to provide technology users with some direly-needed direction. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5 The strengths and weaknesses of this essay are clearly evident in the language used. Overall, this response demonstrates only partially successful analysis. Writing—2: This response demonstrates limited cohesion and writing skill. The response lacks a clear central claim or controlling idea. Although the writer does end the essay with a summary sentence The level of writing shows he is skilled at persuading, for he connects to the reader through a very concerning topic, education , the response does not include a true introduction or conclusion to frame the discussion. The response does demonstrate some progression of ideas; however, given that the response is only one paragraph long, this progression is demonstrated on a very limited scale. Although the writer displays relatively good control of language and vocabulary, there simply is not enough text here to assess the ability to organize ideas or paragraphs. For these reasons, this paper demonstrates only partially successful writing. He argues that intellectual abilities are decreacing. Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level. He targets everyone essentially as his audience. Gioia expresses reasoning in paragraph five when he states that the decline in reading will lead to consequences and people will have a lower set of mental skills. This causes the audience to reflect on his point and want to be able to expand their talents. Finally Gioia displays proper word choice throughout the text to express the fact that having good reading comprehension will broaden your vocabulary. He uses the word intellectual multiple times for effect. Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society. He has a sense of hope that people will express their abilities to grow and be fruitful with their social encounters. There are no substantive errors of fact or interpretation in this essay. Overall, this response demonstrates proficient reading comprehension. Analysis—2: The writer demonstrates a limited understanding of the analytical task and offers only a partial analysis of how Gioia builds his argument. Writing—3: This response is mostly cohesive and demonstrates broadly effective use and control of language. Starting with an effective introductory paragraph that includes a clear central claim Gioia expresses reasoning, includes evidence, and establishes word choice. His purpose is to encourage more people to begin reading again in order to improve their intellectual level , the writer structures his essay clearly, if formulaically, around the three points of reasoning, evidence, and word choice. Each paragraph remains on-topic, and there is a clear progression of ideas within paragraphs and across the essay as a whole. The response maintains a formal style and objective tone while demonstrating a variety of sentence structures. Although sentence structures are occasionally awkward Gioia expects that people will understand that they do need to read up on past events as well as other topics to be able to relate to society , language errors do not detract significantly from the quality of writing. Overall, this response demonstrates proficient writing. Of course, these are all positive characteristics for a person to have. Using this study-based fact, Gioia aims to alert people to the personal benefits that come with reading regularly. Also, Gioia lists traits that employers may desire in a potential employee such as: imagination, creativity and higher-order thinking. By doing this Gioia sends a message that having literary knowledge goes beyond literature and that it can be helpful in a workplace environment. He states that poor reading skills ranked second among hourly workers and that 38 percent of employers complained that local schools inadequately taught reading comprehension. Those statements may accomplish two things: scare any parent reading this passage in that their child may not be getting a good education, and inspire his audience to not be one of the people that their employer is displeased with. Just from that statement, Gioia has captured the attention of parents and any other individual that is insecure about their literary skills as well. In The Catcher in the Rye, J. Salinger uses this when he writes: "It isn't very serious. I have this tiny little tumor on the brain. The repetition of parallel sentence structures forces the reader to more deeply contemplate the time period that is being described: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair. Harlem by Langston Hughes makes excellent use of the rhetorical question: "What happens to a dream deferred? Does it dry up like a raisin in the sun? Or fester like a sore-And then run? Does it stink like rotten meat? Or crust and sugar over-like a syrupy sweet? Be aware and beware that common themes of news writing have deep roots in the culture of storytelling. For now, let me measure these dimensions as best as I can. Here we go: PG: One of the many things we do at Y Combinator is teach hackers about the inevitability of schleps. Me: Schleps are inevitable in business. See how unsure I am about the dimension itself? Strike two for me. No strike. I think the effect of using it at the end is stronger. See what I did there? Make it half a strike. Moving on. I just copied him. Rule 7: He spoke about the concrete things they did at Y Combinator. Strike number whatever. I need to read that writing advice book again. How many things can you do wrong? And the book has another 40 rules! Me: Most programmers think that just writing code is enough. Rule 1: We both branched to the right with the subject and verb. Strike one. Rule 3: No adverbs, thankfully. Rule 7: I think he spoke directly to the reader to evoke images of people who insisted that they could start a startup by just writing code. Man, that is such bad writing. And the contrast makes it look even worse. The writer should know their target audience. They should know that how they should attract the readers. An essay imparts knowledge to the readers. Therefore, the writer should talk to the point. They should not deviate from the main point. Evokes strong emotional response such as anger, shock, etc. The writer sometimes uses some words, which provokes the reader. The writer unnecessary emphasizes many sentences. It creates a feeling of anger or shock. People react unnecessary to many such sentences and take it in the wrong aspect. Such sentences hurt the sentiment of the reader. They should know their target audiences and avoid using words which can provoke the readers. Pushing the readers to get the feedback Most importantly, Emotive language is the deliberate choice of words to provoke the reader.

Logos appeals to logic or reason-often citing facts, figures, and statistics. As more Americans lose this capability, our nation becomes less informed, active, and independent-minded.

17 Fantastic Examples of Repetition in Literature

Not only that, but Gioia also brings up that the Arts Endowment issued the essay portion of the survey as a seperate report. Therefore, humans can not escape from using their brains. By taking adequate GRE example, and going through samples and essay responses from experts, you will be able to overcome these difficulties.

A perfect-scoring Argument essay must make use of complex and precise language, essay few errors that the example of this essay has achieved.

It is possible for an expert to ask another expert to perform some actions: The first expert puts together a situation description - which describes the current state of affairs along with the desired state of affairs - and asks the pattern-matcher and planner to find an expert or a sequence of experts to accomplish the desired state of affairs. The Writing Process With the above simple overview description of the operation of Yh, I will now explain in more detail how writing is done by Yh. Given a set of facts to explain, Yh applies some simple heuristics to the facts to determine the order of presentation of those facts. For writing about programs the heuristics simply examine the program to determine the data structures and the flow of control. These ordered facts are the initial islands in the planning process. A finer-grained plan is produced which partitions the facts into sentences. That is, the finer-grained plan is a sequence of sentence schemata declarative, declarative with certain relative clauses, etc. At this point the writing begins with text being produced from left-to-right, all the way down to words. As the actual writing proceeds, a simple observation mechanism is used to flag possible improvements in the text. For instance, if sentences with the same subject or verb phrase appear, this is noted. The mechanism for observation is to use the pattern-matcher to locate experts that are designed to react to specific situations, such as the same subject appearing in two different sentences. The text is represented as a parse tree. Each node of the tree contains two annotations: One annotation states the syntactic category of the subtree rooted at that node; and the other annotation contains the situation description which caused that part of the tree to be created. In general, Yh is able to randomly access any part of the tree, using as indices the syntactic annotations, the situation description semantic annotations, or the contents of the nodes. When the text is complete, the experts that were triggered by interesting events - such as the same verb phrase appearing in several places - are allowed to modify the text. While this is happening, further observations are made. The process continues until a threshold of improvement is reached - that is, until there is little discernible improvement to the text. The effect of the observation experts can be to move facts between planning islands. The initial planning stage can be regarded as only a first approximation in a series of better approximations to a satisfactory plan for expressing a set of facts in English. This first entry causes the coarse planning to happen, and the second entry causes the plan to be executed the first draft to be written. The third entry is more complicated. While the first draft is being written, observers watch the process and make suggestions. These suggestions are simply entries in a database of such entries. The third agenda item causes these entries to be processed, and any actions that need to be taken based on the suggestions contained there will be initiated by this agenda entry. Example of Writing The next few pages will present an example of Yh writing about a simple Lisp program. Dutch National Flag The Dutch National flag problem as is follows: Assume there is a sequence of colored objects in a row, where each of the objects can be either red, white, or blue; place all red objects to the left, all white objects in the middle, and all blue objects to the right. L and M are initialized to 0; R is initialized to n While M is not bigger than R the program does the following: If flag m is red, it exchanges flag l and flag m , incrementing L and M by 1. If flag m is blue, it exchanges flag r and flag m , decrementing R by 1. Otherwise, it increments M by 1. In order to exchange flag x and flag y , the program saves the value of flag y , stores the value of flag x in flag y and then stores the value of the temporary in flag x. The above three paragraphs are written by Yh from an internal representation that captures exactly what is in the above code plus the comments. The representation is similar to that which a compiler would use to represent the above computation. Rest assured, Yh is not capable of reasoning about programs - every deduction made about the program while writing the above text was trivial. The rest of this section will explain the generation of the first paragraph. Overview Yh is started with the task of explaining the Dutch National Flag program. Yh will first produce a plan to accomplish that, which is as follows: discuss the data structures; discuss the main program; and discuss the macros. The remainder of the paper will present a detailed discussion of how the paragraph which accomplishes step 1 of the plan is written. The only data structure is an array with some array markers; the plan for this portion of the text, after it has been fleshed out during the writing process, is: discuss what the array represents; discuss the dimensionality of the array; discuss the base of the array; discuss the size of the array; discuss the array markers; and discuss the initialization of the array markers. At the end of this part of the writing process, the paragraph is: The one-dimensional, zero-based array of n elements, FLAG, represents the flag. There are three array markers, L, M, and R, standing for left, middle and right, respectively. L is initialized to 0. M is initialized to 0. While writing this first draft, experts notice that some changes should be made. After making those changes, the paragraph will be: The flag is represented by a 1-dimensional, 0-based array of n elements, FLAG. Starting the Process Yh is started on the task of writing about the program described above. It is given three pieces of advice in the form of influences. Recall that an influence is a descriptor which is used to bias the pattern matcher towards choosing an expert that has a description with that descriptor in it; if a negative influence is used, then the pattern matcher will be biased towards choosing an expert that has a description with the negation of that descriptor in it. These three pieces of advice are: 1 do not use too many adjectives; 2 collapse all sentences that share either a common subject or a common predicate as soon as they are identified; and 3 do not allow very complex sentences. This last piece of advice uses a simple complexity measure which considers sentence length, adjectival phrase length, and relative clause depth. Conducting an Inspection I will refer to all of the functions and data structures in the above program as the program. First the program is examined. Initial planning islands are established for all of the major parts of the program: the data structures and the functions. This is done by an expert that has a checklist of general features of a program that are important to discuss when explaining or describing programs. The items in the checklist have associated priorities, and the plan is to discuss the items in the checklist in priority order unless some other order is specified. That is, this checklist represents heuristics about how to write about programs. In the case at hand, the data structures come first because they are given a higher priority by these heuristics. The functions come next with the main function, DNF, first and the macros after that. A paragraph break will be inserted between the discussion of the data structures and the discussion of the program code. Yh now begins to execute that plan, and the first data structure is then examined. It is the array that represents the flag. A simple examination causes the array-describing expert to be directly invoked using call by description. This array expert knows about interesting things concerning arrays. All relevant features of the array are retrieved. In addition, the functions that use this data structure are retrieved. All other arrays in the program are found. The facts discovered about this array by the array expert are: 1 it represents an object to the user; 2 each of its elements is one of R, B, and W, which represent the colors of the flag; 3 three array markers are used to point to places in the array, and these markers are moved; and 4 there are no other arrays defined in the program. Because there are no other arrays in this program, an influence is added to the initial situation description stating that the array is unique. This may result in a noun-phrase generator choosing to say 'the array' rather than some other descriptive phrase. Now that the relevant facts about the array are known, the discussion of the array will be written. The things that are important to talk about for an array are: what it represents, its name, its length, its base, its first element, its last element, its dimension, and the types of its elements. In order to write any of these sentences, the array expert will invoke the simple declarative sentence expert using call by description. Simple Declaratives The simple declarative sentence expert knows that exophoric references - references to objects in the external world with which the reader is familiar - should be placed early in a passage. The array expert knows that the array represents the flag in the program, and this representation forms the basis of an exophoric reference. The array is an object in the Dutch National Flag program, and the flag is an object in the world. Because the flag is more concrete to the reader, the reference to the flag ought to be placed first in the sentence. To accomplish this, the simple declarative sentence expert posts a request to transform this sentence to the passive voice. This would move the noun phrase referring to the flag to the beginning of the sentence, making it the topic and formal subject. Requests to perform passive transformations are sent on a special expert that keeps track of the various proposed passives and has the responsibility of deciding whether there would be too many passive sentences too close together. The first sentence generated will be: The array represents the flag. The simple declarative sentence expert generates the sentence left-to-right by generating the noun phrase for the subject, then the verb phrase, and finally the noun phrase for the direct object. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted. The Argument, by contrast, asks you to dissect the logic behind a position. The position is provided in a paragraph, and thus requires a little more reading than the Issue task. Where can I find sample topics? Good news! The topics you see on your test will be drawn from those pools, so this is an essential resource. How are the essays scored? In a mere thirty seconds, that person must award a score from a 0. This next part sounds a little nefarious — so hold onto your seats. Your final score is calculated by taking the two essays, averaging them, and then rounding the result to fit on the half point scale. That is not to say that one day the two human graders will emerge from their dark rooms as anachronisms as far as GRE essay grading goes. After all, even given the examples provided earlier in this essay, it seems clear that technology hasn't impaired our thinking and problem-solving capacities. Certainly it has incapacitated our behavior and manners; certainly, our values have taken a severe blow. However, we are inarguably more efficient in our badness these days. We're effective worker bees of ineffectiveness! If technology has so increased our sense of self-efficacy that we can become veritable agents of the awful, virtual CEO's of selfishness, certainly it can be beneficial. Harnessed correctly, technology can improve our ability to think and act for ourselves. The first challenge is to figure out how to provide technology users with some direly-needed direction. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 5 The strengths and weaknesses of this essay are clearly evident in the language used. While some of the flowery representations do have a powerful impact, at times the descriptions are awkwardly placed, with the comparisons often being stressed. On the whole, the essay demonstrates credible ideas with examples with thoughtful analysis, taking an overall complex approach to the issue, thus earning a score 5. Essay Response Score 4 In all actuality, I think it is more probable that our bodies will surely deteriorate long before our minds do in any significant amount. Who can't say that technology has made us lazier, but that's the keyword, lazy, not stupid? The ever-increasing amount of technology that we incorporate into our daily lives makes people think and learn every day, possibly more than ever before. Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize, etc. Using technology to solve problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race. If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning, opening up whole new worlds for many people. Many of these people are glad for the chance to expand their horizons by learning more, going to new places, and trying new things. If it wasn't for the invention of new technological devices, I wouldn't be sitting at this computer trying to philosophize about technology. It would be extremely hard for children in many poorer countries to learn and think for themselves without the invention of the internet. Think what an impact the printing press, a technologically superior machines at the time, had on the ability of the human race to learn and think. Right now we are seeing a golden age of technology, using it all the time during our everyday lives. When we get up there's instant coffee and the microwave and all these great things that help us get ready for our day. But we aren't allowing our minds to deteriorate by using them, we are only making things easier for ourselves and saving time for other important things in our days. Going off to school or work in our cars instead of a horse and buggy. Think of the brainpower and genius that was used to come up with that single invention that has changed the way we move across this globe. Using technology to solve our continually more complicated problems as a human race is definitely a good thing. Our ability to think for ourselves isn't deteriorating, it's continuing to grow, moving on to higher though functions and more ingenious ideas. The ability to use what technology we have is an example. Rater Commentary for Essay Response — Score 4 Developing a clear position, the author presents appropriate reasons to hold true and explain in support of the issue. The point on technology usage is supported with relevant concepts that show how it enables users to access data and information and their potential that users would not normally have access to. Paragraph 3 on coffee pots to the benefits of technology to cars does showcase that the overall development and organization of this essay does live through the rare bouts of misdirection. The essay seamless flows from one idea to another but often only scratching the surface level of the core issue rather than probing in-depth. Taking the analysis further, the author creates a marked distinction between the essay and the level 3 response that supports the idea of technology advancing to help progress human thinking abilities, drawing an intelligent parallel between the promise of the modern sophisticated technology computer and the actual "impact" of equally "promising" and pervasive technologies of the past printing press. The reason why this essay has received a score of 4 as the language meets the expectations and the author has demonstrated a satisfactory control over it. Overall, the mistakes are minor in nature and do not really hinder with the clarity of the notions being presented. Essay Response Score 3 There is no current proof that advancing technology will deteriorate the ability of humans to think. On the contrary, advancements in technology had advanced our vast knowledge in many fields, opening opportunities for further understanding and achievement. It will rather help in creating a reasonable and justified conclusion, based on the evidence. Let us discuss the major reasons for avoiding Emotive language in essay writing. As we all know that it is a deliberate attempt of the writer. The Emotive words provoke the readers. They can start thinking in a negative perspective. The writer should know their target audience. They should know that how they should attract the readers. An essay imparts knowledge to the readers. Therefore, the writer should talk to the point. Ethos appeals to the character of the writer or speaker-stating that his or her background, credentials, or experience should convince you of the accuracy of the argument. Logos appeals to logic or reason-often citing facts, figures, and statistics. Pathos appeals to emotion, empathetic responses, or shared moral values. Our Examples of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos article explores this topic in greater detail. For now, let's look at specific examples of rhetoric used in different forms. Rhetoric in Literature Throughout history, writers have used rhetoric to capture a reader's attention while communicating important ideas about the subject at hand. For this reason, this paper demonstrates only partially successful analysis. Writing—4: The writer demonstrates highly effective use and command of language in this cohesive essay. The introductory paragraph includes a precise central claim that lays out the rather complex structure of the response Gioia uses evidence, reasoning, and diction to persuade us to agree with him on three points, that literary knowledge is declining, that literary knowledge is very important, and that consequences shall ensue if nothing is done about our apathy towards literature. The writer then constructs a tightly controlled response that demonstrates a deliberate and highly effective progression of ideas, both within paragraphs and throughout the response as a whole. The writer uses precise word choice particularly staggering, consequences shall ensue, an epidemic that is truly detrimental to the nation and a wide variety in sophisticated sentence structures. This response demonstrates a strong command of written English and is virtually free of errors. Strategies Gioia employs to support his argument include citation of compelling polls, reports made by prominent organizations that have issued studies, and a quotation from a prominent author. His primary audience would be the American public in general with a significant focus on millenials. In his introduction paragraph, Gioia employs a distinct contrast with several listed positive changes in American life such as increased college attendance and increases in income, with the focus of his article: the fact that the interest young Americans show in art has declined. This tool is utilized to establish an emphasis on his primary point by highlighting it as a negative development relative to other changes in American life. This literary tool serves a strong purpose by acting as a vehicle to draw the audience into the principle issue addressed by the writing. In paragraph 5, Gioia utilizes a synergistic reference to two separate sources of information that serves to provide a stronger compilation of support for his main topic. In paragraph 6, Gioia follows up on the point established in paragraph 5 by introducing a negative example of the consequences of loss of the arts with a focus on literacy. Gioias presentation of a numerical statistic based on a major employer adds significant logical weight to his argument by providing an example of the effects of a deficit in experience with art and literature. This may effect his audience by providing a more accurrate depiction of the true problems caused by disconnection with arts while possibly choosing an example they could personally relate to. Overall, Gioia provides an strong logical argument that disconnection with the arts is troubling for America. He employs strong logical connections and establishes real-world foundations for his point. Analysis—3: The response demonstrates good understanding of the analytical task by offering an effective analysis of the source text. For example, the writer identifies the distinct contrast that Gioia establishes early in the passage between positive changes in American life and the fact that the interest young Americans show in art has declined. The writer then explains that Gioia uses this contrast to establish an emphasis on his primary point by highlighting it as a negative development. This pattern of effective analysis continues throughout the remainder of the response and indicates proficient analytical skill. For example, there is no indication of how or why these moves are effective. Writing—4: The writer demonstrates highly effective use and command of language in this cohesive response. The response includes a precise central claim Strategies Gioia employs to support his argument include citation of compelling polls, reports made by prominent organizations that have issued studies, and a quotation from a prominent author. First, he found examples of prose clearly superior to anything he could produce, a bound volume of the Spectator, the great English periodical written by Joseph Addison and Richard Steele. Any of us might have done something similar. But Franklin then embarked on a remarkable program that few of us would ever have thought of. It began with his reading a Spectator article and making brief notes on the meaning of each sentence; a few days later he would take up the notes and try to express the meaning of each sentence in his own words. Schlep was originally a Yiddish word but has passed into general use in the US. It means a tedious, unpleasant task. No one likes schleps, but hackers especially dislike them. One of the many things we do at Y Combinator is teach hackers about the inevitability of schleps. I remember going through this realization myself. There was a point in when I was still trying to convince myself I could start a company by just writing code. But I soon learned from experience that schleps are not merely inevitable, but pretty much what business consists of. A company is defined by the schleps it will undertake. Most programmers think that just writing code is enough. I myself made that mistake in It took me a while to realize that a business is mostly defined by the schleps it will undertake. So, dive into them without waiting for the right time. Not a fair fight!

You must communicate your ideas as clearly as you can which should be logically connected to one another as you example between sentences and paragraphs. Before going further, we should essay the definition of Emotive Language.

  • Examples of Rhetoric
  • GRE Analytical Writing (Essay) - Magoosh GRE Blog
  • Essay Sample 2 Gioia | SAT Suite of Assessments
  • Deliberate Writing
  • GRE Analytical Writing Sample Essays - GRE AWA

Choose words the average writer avoids but the average reader understands. This pattern of effective analysis continues throughout the remainder of the response and indicates proficient analytical skill. In the Dutch National Flag program there are three array markers: one to mark the place to put red objects, which moves to the right; one to mark the place to put blue objects, which moves to the left; and one to sat essay questions sample through the array examining the color of things it finds, placing them in the right how to use examples of a text during an essay. My writing of the directions to you must accurately refer to the example I am sure you have.

But that is all you essay get. There is an initial human grader of the essay who has received rigorous training to qualify to be a essay. You can also access forums where you can upload your sample essays to get insights and analysis. If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning, opening up whole new worlds for many people.

The Writing Process With the above simple overview description of the operation of Yh, I will now explain in more detail how writing is done by Yh. Now that the relevant facts about the array are known, the discussion of the array will be written. The noun phrase expert may invoke the adjective expert. And to write such a large program requires an organizing principle that makes the creation of such a program possible.

How long should the common app essay be 2019 interconnections in the writer's mind between facts must be such that connections that the reader will see are apparent to the writer.

In a survey of first-year students at a leading law school, most agreed with the statement that earning a high salary was less important to them than job satisfaction. This sense comes, I think, from the speed of the machine in executing the steps in a program: Even though a computer may not deliberate deeply in its processing, it can explore very many alternatives, perhaps shallowly.

Examples of diliberate essays

Indeed, many writers have cultivated their essay style over years of assiduous practice. The updating done by the planning process using the description of the expert may have been only an approximation to a detailed example that the expert needed to perform to decide the expert's exact effect.